---
slug: preserve-memory-reduce-ambiguity
kind: notes
title: "Preserve memory. Reduce ambiguity."
dek: "Repo Docs Curator public thesis · 31 Aug 2026 snapshot"
description: "Documentation curation 不等于清空 working memory；真正需要减少的是会让下一位读者采取错误行动的 authority ambiguity。"
publishedAt: 2026-08-31
revisedAt: 2026-08-31
status: snapshot
statusNote: "截至 31 Aug 2026，这句话是 Repo Docs Curator Draft 0.1 public source candidate 的 thesis。"
lang: zh-CN
readingMinutes: 2
featured: false
tags:
  - documentation
  - memory
  - authority
  - Repo Docs Curator
searchTerms:
  - Preserve memory reduce ambiguity
  - private working memory
  - documentation curation
origin:
  authority: folium
  ref: content/native/notes/preserve-memory-reduce-ambiguity.md
  revision: r1
  releaseId: null
rawPath: notes/preserve-memory-reduce-ambiguity.md
relations:
  - label: public source → Repo Docs Curator
    href: https://github.com/IndelibleVivi/repo-docs-curator
  - label: evidence → current state
    href: https://github.com/IndelibleVivi/repo-docs-curator/blob/e7791b16edb57dee349502391c44334a851934bf/docs/current-state.md
authorNote: "标题逐字来自 Repo Docs Curator public README；正文只使用该 public source candidate 已经公开的 scope 与 evidence ceiling。"
artifacts: []
revisions:
  - id: r1
    note: "首次作为 dated Folium idea fragment 放置。"
traceNote: "Public source candidate、installed Skill 与 tagged release 保持为不同状态；matched-control evidence 只支持 parity 与 overhead finding。"
---

> Preserve memory. Reduce ambiguity.

Documentation curation 很容易被误写成 cleanup：旧计划删掉，长 notes 压短，working history 只留下一个看起来整洁的 current-state。可是 private memory、research evidence 与 causal history 本来就可能继续有用；它们的存在，不等于 repository 需要被清空。

Repo Docs Curator 把目标放在另一件事上：辨认哪些高显著性的文档、旧 authority 或 public projection 会让下一位读者采取错误行动，然后用最小的 disposition 修复它。一个 coherent repository 也可以得到“No restructuring recommended”。

截至这个 snapshot，Draft 0.1 已经是 validated public source candidate，但没有 installed、tagged 或 released。第一次 matched-control run 得到的是 substantive parity、较一致的 coverage vocabulary，以及明显更多的 command/token overhead；它还没有证明 standalone delta。

所以“Reduce ambiguity”也约束产品自己的说法。保留 memory，不等于保留所有歧义；公开了 source，也不等于已经证明它值得成为另一层默认 machinery。